The+Decades+Project+Peer+Evaluation+Rubric

Multimedia Project : Decades Group Project Peer Evaluation
Teacher Name: **Jennifer Doorenbos**

Student Name: ________________________________________
 * **CATEGORY** || **4** || **3** || **2** || **1** ||
 * **Presentation** || Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. || Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. || Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. || Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. ||
 * **Content** || Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. || Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. || Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * **Originality** || Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. || Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. || Uses other people\'s ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. || Uses other people\'s ideas, but does not give them credit. ||
 * **Oral Presentation** || Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. || Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention. || Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time. || Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost. ||
 * Organization || Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. || Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. || Content is logically organized for the most part. || There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. ||
 * **Mechanics** || No misspellings or grammatical errors. || Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. || Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. || More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar. ||
 * **Originality** || Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. || Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. || Uses other people\'s ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. || Uses other people\'s ideas, but does not give them credit. ||
 * **Workload** || The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members. || The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person. || The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work. || The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work. ||
 * **Sources** || Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. || Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. || Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. || Very little or no source information was collected. ||
 * Comments:**

Date Created: **Mar 26, 2012 06:14 pm (UTC)**